Addressing hot takes about scientific research done on music
I’m always interested in ‘hot takes’ on micro-blogging platforms that take issues with scientific research done on music.
I’m always interested in ‘hot takes’ on micro-blogging platforms that take issues with scientific research done on music.
Last week the panel discussion from last year’s SMPC was published in Auditory Perception and Cognition.
After reading this article in The Atlantic I think it’s time to jump ship on Twitter.
A few days ago Amy Belfi pointed out it’s been ten years since we met.
One of the best questions to ask yourself (and others) is:
Today we submitted the transcript of the panel that the Society for Music and Perception’s Anti Racism and Equity Committee organized at last summer’s conference in Portland, Oregon.
I spent the second half of last week in the UK, doing an in-depth dive on spectrograms at both Goldsmiths and Cambridge.
Sketch of impluse talk I planned to deliver at Monte Verita Workshop
Sketch of impulse talk I planned to deliver at Monte Verita Workshop
Last week a paper that Mitty Ma, Emily Elliott and some of my former LSU colleagues worked on was published at Musicae Scientae.
I was fortunate to spend this last week at Monte Verità in Switzerland, attending a workshop on decoding musical structure.
Having just completed a few abstract reviews for SysMus 21, I have a two thoughts I think are worth sharing.